Article written by Mike

Mike is an aspiring writer of all kinds of topics. He’s dabbled in sports writing, covering some of the local professional teams in Phoenix, Arizona, done a bit of work for the Associated Press and have written for local papers.

No responses to “George Clooney, Tom Hanks and others trying to end the Writer’s Strike”

  1. The Trousered Ape

    Clooney must be so big he can follow his own lead – nice, I did not realize he was that big of a star!

    Glad to see Hanks and Clooney stepping in though. Hopefully Finke is correct and more top-tier stars will become catalysts to get this ship “writed”. :) yeah, I couldn’t resist…

  2. MichaelB (formerly known as Chaplin)

    I wish people would stop automatically assuming the studios are the ones at fault here. Everyone like to assign blame to the big companies, when in reality, it is an equal share.

    Everyone believes that every day the writers are asking to meet and the studios say “NO!” That is absolutely not the case.

    Warner Bros. recently came out and told 1000 people that they would be laid off (and rehired when the strike ended). And yet, WB got blasted for it. Why is that? Yes, the studios need to step up to the plate, but the writers need to as well.

    Writers are left in the cold in many issues, I agree. But the issue they are spending all their time on, Internet profits (which don’t exist, by the way), is going about it the wrong way and is why there is no movement.

  3. Mike

    Someone is saying no, or else why would this not be ended? All parties are just sitting around, loving to lose money?

    I think Nikki Finke is pretty “in the know” when it comes to her blog, and at least for her, that’s what she says about it.

    I don’t get your Warner Bros. question. Why would they get blasted? Maybe because they are laying people off instead of sitting down and hashing out a deal with the writers? I dunno…

  4. MichaelB (formerly known as Chaplin)

    Again, you are throwing blame around without real substantial information. Granted, I am a bit biased, but I’ve worked for my company for a long time and while it is easy for outsiders to portray them as awful corporate Nazis, that’s not the way it is at all.

    It’s really easy to say that WB is laying off people rather than going to the negotiating table, because that makes more people flock to the writer’s cause, when they have no clue as to how much either side is doing.

    The writers are using the media (and their children) very shrewdly by swaying public opinion. EVERYONE is losing in this. Not just the writers. To think that the studios would rather just sit on their hands instead of negotiating is just plain wrong.

    Why don’t you ask the writers why they sit down with the studios and all of a sudden add a bunch more things to their demands? With no warning? How are the studios supposed to react to that? That’s what happened the week before Christmas and why talks broke down. The writers got greedy and it’s biting them in the arse right now.

  5. Mike

    Look Michael, I know you are pretty biased, and unless you sat in on those meetings, you probably know as much as I do.

    I read the news, I read blogs, etc, so please don’t tell me I’m coming from somewhere without “substantial” information.

    Nikki Finke has inside sources, some of which were in THAT particular meeting you say, and nothing like that happened. Here is a quote from what SHE says happened:

    “4th UPDATE (more new information throughout): Let me recap what happened tonight, first and foremost. The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers today at 2:35 PM put a so-called revised proposal, including a list of demands, on the bargaining table to flesh out its New Economic Partnership for the Writers Guild Of America.”

    She basically states the exact opposite of what you do:

    http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/talks-day-8-toldja-amptp-quits-talks-issues-statement-filled-with-lies/

    I’ve read enough and seen enough to believe that yes, both sides should be working harder, but I still think the studios are the ones in control and if they WANTED to end this, they’d get the WGA to sit down and hammer it out.

    You are the one who brought up laying off 1,000 people, yet you still haven’t told me who is to blame for that? Is the AMTPT not negotiating on purpose, or are they waiting in a room somewhere for the WGA to show up and work on a deal?

  6. MichaelB (formerly known as Chaplin)

    Look, Mike, maybe you didn’t know, but I work directly in the New Media field, where the writers are having their differences. So I’d say yes, I DO know more than you do on this particular subject.

    Do you understand negotiating? The WGA sits down with a proposal, the studios say “no, here is ours”, the writers say “no”, and they go home. In fact, the week before Christmas (the last time they had talks), the writers ADDED new demands to their deal, which I’m guessing the producers weren’t prepared to address.

    My god, you actually don’t think the writer you’re quoting isn’t biased? The producers submitted a proposal according to her, and her WGA friends told her it was full of lies. That’s a bunch of crap. She is so biased against the studios that it won’t matter WHAT they do.

    But hey, you know more than me because you’re in the business. Oh. Wait.

Leave a Reply