<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battlestar Galactica prequel in the works?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popcritics.com/2008/01/18/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/18/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works</link>
	<description>Reviewing popular culture so you don&#039;t have to</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Battlestar Galactica spinoff, &#8216;Caprica&#8217; has the green light &#124; Pop Critics - Movies&#124;TV&#124;Books&#124;Music&#124;Reviews</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/18/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works#comment-4811</link>
		<dc:creator>Battlestar Galactica spinoff, &#8216;Caprica&#8217; has the green light &#124; Pop Critics - Movies&#124;TV&#124;Books&#124;Music&#124;Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works/#comment-4811</guid>
		<description>[...] in mid-January, we reported via AICN, that NBC/Universal was interested in moving forward on the Battlestar Galactica spinoff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in mid-January, we reported via AICN, that NBC/Universal was interested in moving forward on the Battlestar Galactica spinoff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scam</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/18/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works#comment-4805</link>
		<dc:creator>Scam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works/#comment-4805</guid>
		<description>I think a BSG prequel would be good if it in some way explained the role of the final 5 cylons who, reportedly, have some link to the first cylon war.

Maybe we would see Tigh, Anders, etc undercover as observers of humanity?

&lt;em&gt;Scam&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Scamtypes/~3/219381157/the-valentines-day-embarrassment.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The ValentineÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s Day Embarrassment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a BSG prequel would be good if it in some way explained the role of the final 5 cylons who, reportedly, have some link to the first cylon war.</p>
<p>Maybe we would see Tigh, Anders, etc undercover as observers of humanity?</p>
<p><em>Scam&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Scamtypes/~3/219381157/the-valentines-day-embarrassment.html' rel="nofollow">The ValentineÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s Day Embarrassment</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/18/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works#comment-4806</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works/#comment-4806</guid>
		<description>I agree, but not on the Temple of Doom bit.  It was a decent movie in it&#039;s own right, and the fact that it was a prequel didn&#039;t really change things one way or another.  It didn&#039;t create a bogus or contradictory backstory or anything like that.  It was just an Indy adventure, timeline didn&#039;t affect things.

&lt;em&gt;Robert&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://expat.savagenet.com/2007/12/15/murder-she-wrote/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Murder, She Wrote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, but not on the Temple of Doom bit.  It was a decent movie in it&#8217;s own right, and the fact that it was a prequel didn&#8217;t really change things one way or another.  It didn&#8217;t create a bogus or contradictory backstory or anything like that.  It was just an Indy adventure, timeline didn&#8217;t affect things.</p>
<p><em>Robert&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://expat.savagenet.com/2007/12/15/murder-she-wrote/' rel="nofollow">Murder, She Wrote</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RT Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/18/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works#comment-4810</link>
		<dc:creator>RT Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works/#comment-4810</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about this. It had better be really good or it&#039;ll be the end of the BSG franchise.

Temple of Doom did well because no one knew (no one I knew knew or something like that) it was a prequel until after it came out.

The SW prequels were crap in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about this. It had better be really good or it&#8217;ll be the end of the BSG franchise.</p>
<p>Temple of Doom did well because no one knew (no one I knew knew or something like that) it was a prequel until after it came out.</p>
<p>The SW prequels were crap in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/18/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works#comment-4809</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works/#comment-4809</guid>
		<description>It was.  It took place before Raiders....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was.  It took place before Raiders&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/18/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works#comment-4808</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works/#comment-4808</guid>
		<description>Temple of Doom was a prequel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Temple of Doom was a prequel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/18/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works#comment-4807</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/battlestar-galactica-prequel-in-the-works/#comment-4807</guid>
		<description>It seems all suscessful movies always go the prequel route... how about going forward and outlying what happens next?!?  This is why STNG was a hit (besides the time gap between the original ST series and any movies or new TV series), it was a step forward (75 years) and not a prequel (yeah great thanks George Lucas we really needed to meet Jar-Jar).  Prequels can be interesting in setting a story we already know, but mostly they arent (Phantom Menance, Temple of Doom to name a few).  Lets go forward with with successful series... but at the same time lets avoid BattleStar Galactica 1980...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems all suscessful movies always go the prequel route&#8230; how about going forward and outlying what happens next?!?  This is why STNG was a hit (besides the time gap between the original ST series and any movies or new TV series), it was a step forward (75 years) and not a prequel (yeah great thanks George Lucas we really needed to meet Jar-Jar).  Prequels can be interesting in setting a story we already know, but mostly they arent (Phantom Menance, Temple of Doom to name a few).  Lets go forward with with successful series&#8230; but at the same time lets avoid BattleStar Galactica 1980&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

