<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek XI high-definition teaser and viral website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popcritics.com/2008/01/22/star-trek-xi-high-definition-teaser-and-viral-website/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/22/star-trek-xi-high-definition-teaser-and-viral-website</link>
	<description>Reviewing popular culture so you don&#039;t have to</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dammit Jim! Star Trek pushed back to 2009</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/22/star-trek-xi-high-definition-teaser-and-viral-website#comment-4890</link>
		<dc:creator>Dammit Jim! Star Trek pushed back to 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/star-trek-xi-high-definition-teaser-and-viral-website/#comment-4890</guid>
		<description>[...] that basically means we saw the teaser for this film a good year and four months before we ever see the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that basically means we saw the teaser for this film a good year and four months before we ever see the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

