<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Television review: &quot;In Plain Sight&quot; (USA)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/television-review-in-plain-sight-usa/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/television-review-in-plain-sight-usa</link>
	<description>Reviewing popular culture so you don&#039;t have to</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:47:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Clinch</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/television-review-in-plain-sight-usa#comment-10248</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Clinch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=3558#comment-10248</guid>
		<description>Very nice and useful post I really appreciate you posting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice and useful post I really appreciate you posting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/television-review-in-plain-sight-usa#comment-10247</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 06:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=3558#comment-10247</guid>
		<description>No problem Sam, but thanks for taking the time to persuade me :)

It is a good show, I like it a lot more now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem Sam, but thanks for taking the time to persuade me <img src='http://popcritics.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It is a good show, I like it a lot more now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Buck</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/television-review-in-plain-sight-usa#comment-10246</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=3558#comment-10246</guid>
		<description>And I apologize for not reading your updated post.  I wish I could delete previous comment.  Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I apologize for not reading your updated post.  I wish I could delete previous comment.  Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Buck</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/television-review-in-plain-sight-usa#comment-10245</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=3558#comment-10245</guid>
		<description>I would definitely recommend giving it another shot!  I think it has worked out some of the bugs you brought up and it has amazing story-lines.  It is one to be tuning into in my opinion.  Mary has a depth lacking with a lot of characters these days.  There is a lot left to explore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely recommend giving it another shot!  I think it has worked out some of the bugs you brought up and it has amazing story-lines.  It is one to be tuning into in my opinion.  Mary has a depth lacking with a lot of characters these days.  There is a lot left to explore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;In Plain Sight&#8221; thoughts after four episodes &#124; Pop Critics - Movies&#124;TV&#124;Books&#124;Music&#124;Reviews</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/television-review-in-plain-sight-usa#comment-10244</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;In Plain Sight&#8221; thoughts after four episodes &#124; Pop Critics - Movies&#124;TV&#124;Books&#124;Music&#124;Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=3558#comment-10244</guid>
		<description>[...] I first reviewed In Plain Sight, the new series from the USA Network, I wasn&#8217;t too impressed. I didn&#8217;t get the humor right away, I thought some of the acting seemed unrealistic and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I first reviewed In Plain Sight, the new series from the USA Network, I wasn&#8217;t too impressed. I didn&#8217;t get the humor right away, I thought some of the acting seemed unrealistic and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty Dub</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/television-review-in-plain-sight-usa#comment-10243</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty Dub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=3558#comment-10243</guid>
		<description>I only saw the preview (800 times, thanks USA), but yet had the same review.  Weird.  ;-)

Scotty Dubs last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://careerwaymark.com/2008/06/02/get-linkedin-with-the-future-president/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Get LinkedIn with the future President&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only saw the preview (800 times, thanks USA), but yet had the same review.  Weird.  <img src='http://popcritics.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Scotty Dubs last blog post..<a href="http://careerwaymark.com/2008/06/02/get-linkedin-with-the-future-president/" rel="nofollow">Get LinkedIn with the future President</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/television-review-in-plain-sight-usa#comment-10242</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=3558#comment-10242</guid>
		<description>See, that bar scene just seemed hokey to me. Like you said, it showed who she is, but it just really, REALLY didn&#039;t make me laugh. That kind of thing should be funny, but it was almost embarrassing in the way it was over-the-top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, that bar scene just seemed hokey to me. Like you said, it showed who she is, but it just really, REALLY didn&#8217;t make me laugh. That kind of thing should be funny, but it was almost embarrassing in the way it was over-the-top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/television-review-in-plain-sight-usa#comment-10241</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=3558#comment-10241</guid>
		<description>See, I&#039;m not with you guys on that. Take out Leslie Ann Warren (who has been playing the same over-the-top drunken floozy for 20 years) and I thought the acting was fine. I particularly liked the way Mary McCormack seemed uncomfortable in her own skin. Confident one minute, frustrated and bumbling the next.

I thought the whole sequence in the bar summed her up pretty well. From acting tough with the bartender and being shown up for her ignorance all the way through her final &quot;I hope he calls,&quot; McCormack told me who Mary Shannon is and wants to be.

Richards last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://coyotesqrl.blogspot.com/2008/05/fsw-rachael-ray-terrorist.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FSW: Rachael Ray, Terrorist!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I&#8217;m not with you guys on that. Take out Leslie Ann Warren (who has been playing the same over-the-top drunken floozy for 20 years) and I thought the acting was fine. I particularly liked the way Mary McCormack seemed uncomfortable in her own skin. Confident one minute, frustrated and bumbling the next.</p>
<p>I thought the whole sequence in the bar summed her up pretty well. From acting tough with the bartender and being shown up for her ignorance all the way through her final &#8220;I hope he calls,&#8221; McCormack told me who Mary Shannon is and wants to be.</p>
<p>Richards last blog post..<a href="http://coyotesqrl.blogspot.com/2008/05/fsw-rachael-ray-terrorist.html" rel="nofollow">FSW: Rachael Ray, Terrorist!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jina</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/television-review-in-plain-sight-usa#comment-10240</link>
		<dc:creator>jina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=3558#comment-10240</guid>
		<description>I think the main problem was that all of the acting was really  over-done! They can change the story-telling, but I don&#039;t know if that will fix the acting, Mary included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the main problem was that all of the acting was really  over-done! They can change the story-telling, but I don&#8217;t know if that will fix the acting, Mary included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/television-review-in-plain-sight-usa#comment-10239</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=3558#comment-10239</guid>
		<description>LOL :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL <img src='http://popcritics.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

