Article written by

16 responses to “Fringe recap: "The Same Old Story"”

  1. Mike Olbinski

    Good episode, I'm starting to like Olivia more and more…

    But many things seemed like a stretch in this episode…taking pictures from the last thing she saw? Honestly, the last thing she saw was the guy's face, not the bridge.

  2. The Trousered Ape

    Yeah – i know what you mean…because babies dying from natural causes at the age of 80 after they've only been out of the womb for 30 minutes happens all the time… :)

  3. Jason A Clark

    Well, they did say “one” of the last images she saw. I guess that's how they got around that.

  4. Jason A Clark

    LOL! Great recap!

    I'm diggin' the show despite some of the naysaying from the naysayers (they know who they are).

    The woman's voice kind of bothers me for some reason. Could be that she's British and her American accent isn't perfect yet. Sounds weird for some reason.

    The rest of the dialogue was pretty good with the Dr. getting most of the memorable stuff. I find myself already looking forward to the next episode.

  5. buccaneer81

    The producers couldn't spend a few bucks and take a couple of weeks to get any stock footage of the Boston area? It's beyonf awful. They're filming in Toronto and anyone who knows Massachusetts sees how ignorant the writers and producers are of location.
    Examples: 1) The “Boston Federal Building” shot. Sorry, but the real federal building looks nothing like that, nor does the highway system you see to the lower left.
    2) Stoughton is a middle class suburb 20 miles south of Boston. Soccer mom territory. No warehouse district and certainly no “Sargent Bridge.”
    Producers and writers…are you listening?

  6. Mike Olbinski

    She's Australian…yeah, her accent is different, but that's sort of like
    Lee Adama on BSG…he has to mask his English accent into an American one
    and it always has a bit of a distinct difference.

  7. Mike Olbinski

    LOL, alright, but I guess it feels like the “science” part of it should be more realistic to me, but maybe I'm just anal.

    I just felt last night that the eyeball camera sounded a lot like “If we open up the dampners on the aft warp nacelle, we can then influx the antimatter with the protons and create a wormhole that will send us back home in a matter of nanoseconds!”

  8. Mike Olbinski

    Well, at least the opening that said Boston, Mass. was a real shot of the actual bridge in Boston, so give them SOME credit.

  9. Jason A Clark

    That sounds like a knock on Star Trek. I choose to ignore it.

  10. Mike Olbinski

    I love Star Trek, and it's not a knock on it, I'm just saying…it was GOOD for Trek, because they lived in a world 300 years in the future on a flying spaceship made up of God knows what…

    But shows these days, set in our time, need to be a bit more realistic I think.

  11. Jason A Clark

    This coming from a Lost fanatic? :)

  12. Mike Olbinski

    Lost isn't that bad, come on :)

    They've never explained anything away with something like that…

  13. IDR

    I'm really enjoying the show thus far and have no problem with Anna Torv, except perhaps that she's a little young to be playing a 10+ year agent for the F-B-I.

    As Fringe loosely falls into the procedural category, there are always going to be elements that are a little beyond belief (the quick triangulation of the bridge to establish a location, etc.). I simply choose to over look them and enjoy the ride.

    I agree that they'll need Peter to do more than just follow Dunham or his father around while making comments. He needs to develop a specific purpose and contribute more within this trio aside from being the super intelligent legal guardian of Walter and occasional lab assistant/Dunham partner.

    Walter is quickly becoming my favorite character on the show and I look forward any scene with him in it.

  14. The Trousered Ape

    I think “in our time” is a bit of a stretch. It is TV – just ignore it and enjoy the ride. :)

  15. Only Way Out

    I really liked the show and when they showed the scene in Stoughton, MA, I was like ” this is awesome. They actually filmed in the next town over from me? Then I was Hey! there isn't a warehouse district in Stoughton. There isn't a waterfront and where the hell are they in Stoughton that they can see a bridge of that size. There aren't any bridges even close to stoughton.
    The show is good, but the writers really have to get things a little more accurate if they plan on staying afloat with this show. Cutting cormers always falls short in the end.
    I am a diehard X-Files fan and I thought that this show might, in some way be an extension of that show. Maybe it will be. Hopefully!

    Overall though, I like the show and will give it a few more chances.

  16. Mike Olbinski

    I honestly don't think shooting a bridge that isn't there in real life has any bearing on whether or not the show is successful :)

Leave a Reply