<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pop Critics &#187; Mel Gibson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popcritics.com/tags/mel-gibson/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popcritics.com</link>
	<description>Reviewing popular culture so you don&#039;t have to</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mel Gibson To Star In First Movie Since 2002</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/04/29/mel-gibson-to-star-in-first-movie-since-2002</link>
		<comments>http://popcritics.com/2008/04/29/mel-gibson-to-star-in-first-movie-since-2002#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edge Of Darkness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graham King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mel Gibson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Wearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Monahan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=2848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Mel Gibson</strong> has finally found a movie he wants to star in.  Gibson hasn't starred in a movie since 2002 when he had the back to back hits of <strong><em>Signs</em></strong> and <strong><em>We Were Soldiers</em></strong>.  The 52-year-old Gibson has now committed, however, to starring in a film called <strong><em>Edge Of Darkness</em></strong> which is based on a BBC mini-series.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/mel_gibson.jpg" alt="" title="Mel Gibson" width="200" height="209" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2849" /><strong>Mel Gibson</strong> has finally found a movie he wants to star in.  Gibson hasn&#8217;t starred in a movie since 2002 when he had the back to back hits of <strong><em>Signs</em></strong> and <strong><em>We Were Soldiers</em></strong>.  He took off the intervening years to direct 2004&#8242;s <strong><em>The Passion of the Christ</em></strong> and 2006&#8242;s <strong><em>Apocalypto</em></strong> (and possibly to lay low after a drunken run-in with police led to some Jew-bashing).</p>
<p>The 52-year-old Gibson has now committed, however, to starring in a film called <strong><em>Edge Of Darkness</em></strong> which is based on a BBC mini-series.  <strong>Martin Campbell</strong> (<em>Casino Royale, GoldenEye</em>) will direct the feature adaptation of the six-hour 1985 BBC miniseries, which Campbell also directed.</p>
<p>The film will take place in Boston and Gibson will play a straitlaced police investigator whose activist daughter is killed.  He plunges into the case only to uncover systemic corruption that led to his daughter&#8217;s death.</p>
<p>Daily Variety notes that Gibson had long been a fan of the miniseries, and was receptive when producer Graham King and director Martin Campbell approached him several months ago. Shooting on the project begins in Boston in August.  <strong>William Monahan</strong> wrote the script, and Graham King is producing through his GK Films.  Michael Wearing, who produced the original, will also produce, and the BBC will be involved in a producing capacity.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to see Gibson finally getting back to acting.  I&#8217;ve always been a fan of his and it&#8217;s been a long time since we&#8217;ve seen him in anything.  I&#8217;m also a fan of director Martin Campbell who I think made two of the best James Bond movies of all.  I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing what they can put together on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popcritics.com/2008/04/29/mel-gibson-to-star-in-first-movie-since-2002/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: &quot;10,000 BC&quot; (2008)</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/03/10/10000-bc-moviereview</link>
		<comments>http://popcritics.com/2008/03/10/10000-bc-moviereview#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10000 B.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camilla Belle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harald Kloser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mel Gibson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omar Sharif]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland Emmerich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/03/10000-bc-moviereview/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A young hunter is forced to lead a small group of hunters to pursue a band of mysterious warlords to the end of the world to save the girl he loves.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src='http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/2008-03-10_014.jpg' alt='2008-03-10_014.jpg' /></center></p>
<h2>The Essentials</h2>
<p><strong>Title:</strong> <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0443649/">10,000 BC</a> (<a href="http://www.10000bcmovie.com/">official site</a>)<br />
<strong>Directed</strong> by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000386/">Roland Emmerich</a><br />
<strong>Written</strong> by Roland Emmerich &#038; Harald Kloser<br />
<strong>Running Time:</strong> 1:48<br />
<strong>MPAA Rating:</strong>  PG-13 for sequences of intense action and violence.</p>
<h2>The Plot of 10,000 BC</h2>
<p>A young hunter is forced to lead a small group of hunters to pursue a band of mysterious warlords to the end of the world to save the girl he loves.</p>
<h2>The Story of 10,000 BC</h2>
<p>A young girl is rescued by the hunters of a remote mountain village in a prehistoric ice age community.  The girl&#8217;s village has been destroyed and now a prophecy follows the young girl that she will be the woman of the leader who will lead the tribe into a new life and save them from starving as a result of the warming climate and dwindling numbers of mammoths which they hunt and eat.</p>
<p>When she gets older, the young girl, Evolet, and a young hunter, D&#8217;Leh, are in love and are destined to be together.  D&#8217;Leh becomes the leader who wins the girl and will fulfill the prophecy.  But before he can, the same people who killed Evolet&#8217;s people return and kidnap Evolet and many others.  Now, D&#8217;Leh must summon his courage and chase through a changing world to recapture his love and free his people.  Together they must all face one who others worship as a god and who now threatens to enslave them all forever.</p>
<h2>The Review of 10,000 BC</h2>
<p><img class="right" src="http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/10000_bc_payoff_teaser_os-1.jpg" alt="10,000 B.C. Poster" border="0" height="298" width="200">For all the critical drubbing and online negative buzz, 10,000 BC is hardly the worst movie ever made.  Of course, it&#8217;s not nearly the best.</p>
<p>Roland Emmerich is capable of making much better movies than the mish-mash that this film turned out to be.  I wanted to believe the film might be stupid, as I knew it would be, but somehow enjoyable.  A person can only suspend disbelief so far, however, before the film begins to lose all sense of credibility.  This is what happens to 10,000 BC.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have a problem with the characters speaking English.  After all, this is a big budget, action-adventure film.  No one expects the audience to have to read all the dialog.  Now, why they all had different accents&#8230;  I also didn&#8217;t have a problem with the mammoths which I thought looked pretty cool.  I didn&#8217;t feel the same way about the giant turkey/ostrich type things.  I guess they looked ok from a purely special effects point of view (sort of), but the whole idea of them was kind of dumb.  Ditto with the saber-toothed tiger that was just a big pussy-cat once you got to know him.</p>
<p>I think if the film had been given a different title and perhaps no reference to time or place had been made, it would have actually freed up a lot of the problems I had with the historical inaccuracies I (and many critics) had with the film.  Asking us to believe an ice age glacier and a steamy jungle exist merely feet from one another is one thing; asking us to believe mammoths were the animal of choice for the Egyptians building the pyramid in 10,000 BC&#8230;something else entirely.</p>
<p>The story plods along at too slow a pace to really build any sort of suspense.  The narration, though necessary (and provided by the great <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001725/">Omar Sharif</a> &#8211; who, in a surprise to me, isn&#8217;t dead), only added to the sense that the viewer was far removed from the action of the story.  I wanted to care for the characters, but there simply wasn&#8217;t anything to care about.  The dialog was simplistic.  The acting was simply adequate (not even that at times).  Although, the heroine, Evolet, played by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004741/">Camilla Belle</a> was quite pretty and is getting a lot of buzz (for her beauty) so I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll be seeing a lot more of her.</p>
<p>In the end, I really felt like this story was a discarded first script for <em>Stargate</em>.  At one point, the characters make reference to Atlantis, but at other times it seems the filmmakers are attempting to make us think there are otherworldly origins for the &#8220;god&#8221; that rules Egypt (such as another planet).  Both concepts sound like cool ideas, but neither pans out so we&#8217;re left with nothing but a formulaic plot that ends exactly like we always knew it would.</p>
<h2>Watch 10,000 BC If&#8230;</h2>
<p>You&#8217;re too lazy or stupid to read the captions of <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0472043/">Apocalypto</a></em>, Mel Gibson&#8217;s vastly superior (and similar in plot) film.  Otherwise, there&#8217;s no reason to spend big bucks on the theater for this one.  I actually think the special effects will look better on the smaller screen of your television.  Wait for the DVD.<br />
<center><br />
<h2>Rating: 2.5/10</h2>
<p></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popcritics.com/2008/03/10/10000-bc-moviereview/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

