<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pop Critics &#187; Star Trek XI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popcritics.com/tags/star-trek-xi/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popcritics.com</link>
	<description>Reviewing popular culture so you don&#039;t have to</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Some spoilers from the upcoming &quot;Star Trek&quot; film</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/some-spoilers-from-the-upcoming-star-trek-film</link>
		<comments>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/some-spoilers-from-the-upcoming-star-trek-film#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[captain pike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek XI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=3536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/themovieblog/VkTh/~3/299739046/some-star-trek-11-spoilers">The Movie Blog</a>, I saw this piece about some spoilers over at <a href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/27/spoilers-details-on-star-trek-movie-ships/">Trek Movie</a>, in which they detail some of the key ships that we'll see in the latest <strong><em>Star Trek</em></strong> sequel.

One of my favorite parts of the <em>Star Trek</em> movies isn't always the stories and characters, but the starships themselves. I think it stems from my love of building models as a kid. I believe I built about 3-4 different models of the <strong><em>USS Enterprise</em></strong>, although I'm pretty sure they all sucked.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/themovieblog/VkTh/~3/299739046/some-star-trek-11-spoilers">The Movie Blog</a>, I saw this piece about some spoilers over at <a href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/27/spoilers-details-on-star-trek-movie-ships/">Trek Movie</a>, in which they detail some of the key ships that we&#8217;ll see in the latest <strong><em>Star Trek</em></strong> sequel.</p>
<p>One of my favorite parts of the <em>Star Trek</em> movies isn&#8217;t always the stories and characters, but the starships themselves. I think it stems from my love of building models as a kid. I believe I built about 3-4 different models of the <strong><em>USS Enterprise</em></strong>, although I&#8217;m pretty sure they all sucked.</p>
<p>Anyways, here are the main points from the article. Read the entire thing over at <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/themovieblog/VkTh/~3/299739046/some-star-trek-11-spoilers">The Movie Blog</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>- The USS Enterprise NCC-1701 will be a major presence in the movie that will start out being commanded by Captain Pike and then later by James Kirk.</p>
<p>- The movie is being described as â€œa starship adventureâ€?</p>
<p>- A Romulan ship commanded by Nero (Eric Bana). Ship will not look like the traditional Romulan vessel.</p>
<p>- Spock arrives in the past flying a Vulcan 1 man time travel ship.  Heâ€™s not a ghost as some sites have reported</p>
<p>- There is another Federation ship with a big role called the USS Kelvin. The first officer of that ship is George Kirk (Captian Kirkâ€™s dad?)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popcritics.com/2008/06/02/some-spoilers-from-the-upcoming-star-trek-film/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally!  New &quot;Star Trek XI&quot; Details</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/04/14/finally-new-star-trek-xi-details</link>
		<comments>http://popcritics.com/2008/04/14/finally-new-star-trek-xi-details#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Captain Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.J. Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard-Nimoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Orci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek XI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/?p=2547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like forever since weÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve had any new details on J.J. AbramsÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ upcoming Star Trek reboot movie. However, Screen Rant is reporting that Paramount had a panel at Creation EntertainmentÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s 16th Annual GRAND SLAM: THE SCI-FI SUMMIT in Burbank, California, this past weekend in which screenwriter Roberto Orci and Leonard Nimoy was in attendance and the two dished out a few details we haven't heard before.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/2008-04-14_0096.jpg'><img src="http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/2008-04-14_0096.jpg" alt="" title="Star Trek XI" width="500" height="211" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2548" /></a><br />
It seems like forever since we&#8217;ve had any new details on J.J. Abrams&#8217; upcoming <strong><em><a href="http://www.startrekmovie.com/">Star Trek</a></em></strong> reboot movie.  However, Screen Rant is <a href="http://screenrant.com/archives/hungry-for-more-star-trek-deta-1566.html">reporting</a> that Paramount had a panel at Creation Entertainment&#8217;s 16th Annual GRAND SLAM: THE SCI-FI SUMMIT in Burbank, California, this past weekend in which screenwriter <strong>Roberto Orci</strong> was in attendance (co-scripter Alex Kurtzman was not in attendance) as was <strong>Leonard Nimoy</strong>.</p>
<p>A lot of the information that came out is stuff we&#8217;ve already heard or have been hearing rumors of, but some of it is new details.  Here is the majority of it:</p>
<ul>
<li>The film will definitely be rated PG-13.  That doesn&#8217;t really surprise me since <em>Star Trek</em> has always been more of a PG kind of movie.  There was no way they were going to go R with this one.</li>
<li>The release date was pushed back because Paramount wants the movie to be a summer blockbuster and not for any other reason.</li>
<li>The budget on the film is far below the sometimes reported $200M.  A more widely reported $160M budget could still be accurate and is probably in line with other films of this nature.</li>
<li>They went all the way back to the beginning of the original characters because their intent was to &#8220;re-invent&#8221; the Star Trek franchise.  I&#8217;m not really sure why they felt that was necessary.  I think this explanation is partly BS.  I think they went back to the original characters because they thought it would attract audiences already familiar with the characters.</li>
<li>The script was written with Leonard Nimoy in mind so Spock, as suspected, is probably a pretty pivotal character to the film.  Nimoy read and liked the script, of course, which is one of the reasons the film was able to be made.  One would assume they would have had problems had Nimoy not been interested in doing the movie.</li>
<li>Speaking of Nimoy, he actually said that this film, <strong><em>Star Trek 11</em></strong>, is the biggest film he&#8217;s ever worked on and will definitely be worth waiting for.  He reaffirmed Paramount&#8217;s faith in the film as a summer blockbuster.</li>
<li>Nimoy apparently also mentioned that he didn&#8217;t like the death of Captain Kirk in <em>Star Trek: Generations</em>.  In fact, he resented it.  However, he did say that putting Shatner (Kirk) in this film would have been damaging to the story as a whole so he agreed with the decision not to do it.</li>
<li>The USS Enterprise <em>will</em> be assembled in space, although <em>parts</em> of it will be assembled on Earth.</li>
<li>One of the most interesting things revealed was that it was originally Steven Spielberg who read the script and talked to J.J. Abrams about directing it during a set visit to the <em>Transformers</em> set.  Abrams mentioned it to his wife, who also helped talk him into the final decision to take on the massive project.</li>
</ul>
<p>So that&#8217;s the gist of it.  It looks like we now know with some certainty that Shatner will not be appearing in the film as Captain Kirk.  I think that rumor has been pretty rampant so it&#8217;s good that they were able to put an end to it early on.  I think it&#8217;s a shame that his stupid death in <em>Star Trek: Generations</em> is what prevented him from being a part of this project, though.</p>
<p>Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popcritics.com/2008/04/14/finally-new-star-trek-xi-details/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek Set Photos from Cal State Northridge</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/03/18/star-trek-set-photos-from-cal-state-northridge</link>
		<comments>http://popcritics.com/2008/03/18/star-trek-set-photos-from-cal-state-northridge#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cal State Northridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek XI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/03/star-trek-set-photos-from-cal-state-northridge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s been a while since weÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve posted anything new concerning the Star Trek film. The truth is, there hasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t been a lot of new news to report. AICN, however, published some set photos early this morning that were taken at Cal State Northridge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since we&#8217;ve posted anything new concerning the <strong><em><a href="http://www.startrekmovie.com/">Star Trek</a></em></strong> film.  The truth is, there hasn&#8217;t been a lot of new news to report.  <a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/36031">AICN</a>, however, published some set photos early this morning that were taken at Cal State Northridge.  The shots appear to be a scene depicting Star Fleet Academy since everyone seems to be wearing uniforms and the pics are from a school.  See how I put two and two together there?<br />
<center><img width="520" src='http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/trekset1.jpg' alt='trekset1.jpg' /></center><br />
This is just one of the five spy shots on <a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/36031">AICN</a>.  The others depict various angles of the grounds and the &#8220;students&#8221; and includes a futuristic looking car.  <a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/36031">Check &#8216;em out</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popcritics.com/2008/03/18/star-trek-set-photos-from-cal-state-northridge/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Star Trek&#8221; Pushed Back To 2009</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/02/14/star-trek-pushed-back-to-2009</link>
		<comments>http://popcritics.com/2008/02/14/star-trek-pushed-back-to-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angels and Demons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Stiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Fincher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddie Murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nowhereland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renée Zellweger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shawn Wayans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek XI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Curious Case of Benjamin Button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tropic Thunder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/02/star-trek-pushed-back-to-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Variety is reporting the sad news that the release of J.J. Abrams&#8217; Star Trek (official site) has been pushed back to 2009. Originally scheduled for release on December 25, 2008, Star Trek will now bow on May 8, 2009. Star Trek fans everywhere moan. Paramount has their reasons, of course. They apparently believe in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" width="200" src='http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/star-trek-11-poster-2.jpg' alt='Star Trek Teaser Poster 2' />Variety is <a href="http://www.variety.com/VR1117980912.html">reporting</a> the sad news that the release of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0009190/">J.J. Abrams&#8217;</a> <strong><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/">Star Trek</a></em></strong> (<a href="http://www.paramount.com/startrek/">official site</a>) has been pushed back to 2009.  Originally scheduled for release on December 25, 2008, Star Trek will now bow on <strong>May 8, 2009</strong>.</p>
<p><strong><em>Star Trek</em></strong> fans everywhere moan.</p>
<p>Paramount has their reasons, of course.  They apparently believe in the film so much they want to use it as a summer tentpole film and release it during the summer movie season where the blockbuster potential is larger.</p>
<p><em><strong>Star Trek</strong></em> has no competition in its new slot &#8211; at least not yet, although it opens one week after 20th Century Fox opens <strong><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0458525/">X-Men Origins: Wolverine</a></em></strong> and one week before Sony is slated to bow the expected hit sequel <strong><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0808151/">Angels and Demons</a></em></strong>.</p>
<p>The <em><strong>Star Trek</strong></em> change was not the only shuffle Paramount made to its schedule and to the schedule of Dreamworks.  Some of the other changes they made include:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Ben Stiller summer comedy <strong><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0942385/">Tropic Thunder</a></em></strong> is moving from July 11 to Aug. 15</li>
<li>Martin Scorsese&#8217;s Leonardo DiCaprio vehicle <strong><em>Shutter Island</em></strong>&#8230;er&#8230;<strong><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1130884/">Ashecliffe</a></em></strong> will be released Oct. 2, 2009.</li>
<li>An untitled comedy produced by Marlon and Shawn Wayans will be released on Feb. 9, 2009.</li>
<li>The Eddie Murphy family film <strong><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0780567/">Nowhereland</a></em></strong> is moving from Sept. 26, 2008, to June 12, 2009.</li>
<li>Renee Zellweger&#8217;s horror-thriller <strong><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0795351/">Case 39</a></em></strong> is moving from Aug. 22, 2008, to April 10, 2009.</li>
<li>David Fincher&#8217;s Brad Pitt starrer <strong><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0421715/">The Curious Case of Benjamin Button</a></em></strong> is moving from Nov. 26, 2008, to Dec. 19, 2008.</li>
</ul>
<p>Still, it is the <em><strong>Star Trek</strong></em> news that is the most disappointing.  It&#8217;s not that the studio doesn&#8217;t have a valid point and it&#8217;s not that it isn&#8217;t a smart business move.  It just sucks that we have to wait another five months to see a movie we&#8217;ve already so excited about.</p>
<p>In case you&#8217;re doing the math in your head, we saw the teaser in January which means we saw the first trailer for <em><strong>Star Trek</strong></em> a full one year and four months before the film is set to open.  That&#8217;s insane.<br />
<!--bloggingzoom--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popcritics.com/2008/02/14/star-trek-pushed-back-to-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dammit Jim! Star Trek pushed back to 2009</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/02/14/dammit-jim-star-trek-pushed-back-to-2009</link>
		<comments>http://popcritics.com/2008/02/14/dammit-jim-star-trek-pushed-back-to-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreamworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek XI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/02/dammit-jim-star-trek-pushed-back-to-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scotty, we can&#8217;t take much more of this. According to reports from ComingSoon.net, the new Star Trek sequel from J.J. Abrams has been pushed WAY back to May 8th, 2009. It was originally scheduled for a December 25th release this year, but now we have five more months to see where Abrams takes the crew [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Scotty, we can&#8217;t take much more of this</em>.</p>
<p>According to reports from <a href="http://www.comingsoon.net/news/startreknews.php?id=41995">ComingSoon.net</a>, the new <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0796366/"><em>Star Trek</em></a> sequel from J.J. Abrams has been pushed WAY back to May 8th, 2009.</p>
<p>It was originally scheduled for a December 25th release this year, but now we have five more months to see where Abrams takes the crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise.</p>
<p>For us cadets, this means extended shore leave.</p>
<p>The article mentions the move as part of a major reshuffling of the Paramount release calendar, along with DreamWorks.</p>
<p>Insiders tell Coming Soon that the film has a lot more potential to bring in huge bucks if released in May instead of December. Currently that May 8th release date has no competition.</p>
<p>We probably can expect this to happen with some other films since the Writer&#8217;s Strike has thrown off a few movie schedules I&#8217;m sure and studios will want to balance out their earnings in the coming year or two.</p>
<p>So this basically means we saw the <a href="http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/star-trek-xi-high-definition-teaser-and-viral-website/">teaser</a> for this film a good <strong>year and four months</strong> before we ever see the movie.</p>
<p>I for one am bummed at one of the most anticipated movies of 2008 suddenly delayed by such a long time.</p>
<p>Oh well, now I can say I know the first movie I&#8217;m looking forward to in 2009.<!--bloggingzoom--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popcritics.com/2008/02/14/dammit-jim-star-trek-pushed-back-to-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; Forums Go Live!</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/31/official-star-trek-forums-go-live</link>
		<comments>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/31/official-star-trek-forums-go-live#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.J. Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[official site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek XI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/official-star-trek-forums-go-live/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news for you Trekkies out there itching to discuss J.J. Abrams and the new &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; film. The official site has revamped and added The Official Star Trek Movie Forums for all of you to discuss all things Trek related to your heart&#8217;s desire. If you need something to talk about here are a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for you Trekkies out there itching to discuss <strong>J.J. Abrams</strong> and the new &#8220;<strong>Star Trek</strong>&#8221; film.  The <a href="http://www.paramount.com/startrek/"><strong>official site</strong></a> has revamped and added <strong><a href="http://www.paramount.com/startrek/forums/">The Official Star Trek Movie Forums</a></strong> for all of you to discuss all things Trek related to your heart&#8217;s desire.</p>
<p>If you need something to talk about here are a few of the articles we&#8217;ve done recently that might give you something to discuss:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/30/young-kirk-cast-in-star-trek/">Young Kirk Cast In Ã¢â‚¬Å“Star TrekÃ¢â‚¬Â?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/25/new-star-trek-poster-released/">New Ã¢â‚¬Å“Star TrekÃ¢â‚¬Â? Poster Released</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/23/star-trek-viral-site-secrets-revealed/">Star Trek Viral Site &#8211; Secrets Revealed</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/22/star-trek-teaser-trailer-now-available-right-here/">Star Trek Teaser Trailer Now Available Right Here!</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/10/3-spocks-to-appear-in-abrams-star-trek-xi/">3 Spocks To Appear In AbramsÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ Star Trek Ã¢â‚¬Å“XIÃ¢â‚¬Â?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/03/tyler-perrys-why-did-i-get-cast-in-jj-abrams-star-trek-movie/">Tyler PerryÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Ã¢â‚¬Å“Why Did I Get Cast In J.J. AbramsÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ Star Trek Movie?Ã¢â‚¬Â?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.popcritics.com/2007/11/14/first-look-zachary-quinto-as-spock-in-star-trek-xi/">First Look: Zachary Quinto As Spock In Ã¢â‚¬Å“Star Trek XIÃ¢â‚¬Â?</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!--bloggingzoom--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/31/official-star-trek-forums-go-live/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Young Kirk Cast In &#8220;Star Trek&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/30/young-kirk-cast-in-star-trek</link>
		<comments>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/30/young-kirk-cast-in-star-trek#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cast list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.J. Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marlene Forte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek XI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/young-kirk-cast-in-star-trek/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Director J.J. Abrams has cast eleven year old (soon to be 12) Jimmy Bennett (Hostage, Daddy Day Care, Firewall, Evan Almighty) as the young James T. Kirk in the new &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; film. The casting of a young version of Kirk seems to confirm the rumor that we will, in fact, see different timelines in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" width="160" src='http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/jimmy_bennett.jpg' alt='Jimmy Bennett is Young Kirk in Star Trek' />Director <strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0009190/">J.J. Abrams</a></strong> has cast eleven year old (soon to be 12) <strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1497548/">Jimmy Bennett</a></strong> (<em>Hostage, Daddy Day Care, Firewall, Evan Almighty</em>) as the young James T. Kirk in the new &#8220;<strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/">Star Trek</a></strong>&#8221; film.</p>
<p>The casting of a young version of Kirk seems to confirm the rumor that we will, in fact, see different timelines in the upcoming film.  One would assume that most of Bennett&#8217;s scenes will be with <strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0607185/">Jennifer Morrison</a></strong>and <strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1165110/">Chris Hemsworth</a></strong> who play Kirk&#8217;s parents, George and Winona Kirk.</p>
<p>With the casting of Bennett as the Young Kirk and the casting of <strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0287168/">Marlene Forte</a></strong> as &#8220;Chief Transporter&#8221; a few days ago it appears as if all the major roles in the film have now been cast.</p>
<p>Major plot details &#8220;<strong>Star Trek XI</strong>&#8221; are still being kept under wraps, but it is understood that the movie chronicles the early days of the Enterprise crew. The Paramount Pictures project began shooting in November and is expected to continue until March. Release is scheduled for <strong>Christmas Day, 2008.</strong></p>
<h3>The Updated Cast List For &#8220;Star Trek XI&#8221;</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1165110/">Chris Hemsworth</a> (George Samuel Kirk Sr.)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0607185/">Jennifer Morrison</a> (Winona Kirk)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1517976/">Chris Pine</a> (Capt. James T. Kirk)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1497548/">Jimmy Bennett</a> (Young Kirk)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000559/">Leonard Nimoy</a> (Spock)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0002027/">Ben Cross</a> (Sarek &#8211; Spock&#8217;s father)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000213/">Winona Ryder</a> (Amanda Grayson &#8211; Spock&#8217;s mother)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0704270/">Zachary Quinto</a> (Young Spock)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0339304/">Bruce Greenwood</a> (Capt. Christopher Pike)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0881631/">Karl Urban</a> (Dr. Leonard &#8216;Bones&#8217; McCoy)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0670408/">Simon Pegg</a> (Scotty)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0158626/">John Cho</a> (Sulu)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0757855/">Zoe Saldana</a> (Nyota Uhura)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0947338/">Anton Yelchin</a> (Pavel Chekov)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0051509/">Eric Bana</a> (the villain, Nero)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0629697/">Rachel Nichols</a> (Janice Rand?)</li>
<li><a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0004286/">Clifton Collins Jr.</a> (Ayel)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1347153/">Tyler Perry</a> (head of Starfleet Academy)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0287168/">Marlene Forte</a> (Chief Transporter)</li>
</ul>
<p><!--bloggingzoom--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/30/young-kirk-cast-in-star-trek/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; Poster Released</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/25/new-star-trek-poster-released</link>
		<comments>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/25/new-star-trek-poster-released#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.J. Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek XI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/new-star-trek-poster-released/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The powers that be decided that the &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; (official site) poster we&#8217;ve been using for the past couple of months isn&#8217;t good enough now that we have a nice teaser trailer to watch (Star Trek Teaser Trailer Now Available Right Here!) and a time consuming viral website to keep us busy (Star Trek Viral [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The powers that be decided that the &#8220;<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/">Star Trek</a>&#8221; (<a href="http://www.paramount.com/startrek/">official site</a>) poster we&#8217;ve been using for the past couple of months isn&#8217;t good enough now that we have a nice teaser trailer to watch (<a href="http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/22/star-trek-teaser-trailer-now-available-right-here/">Star Trek Teaser Trailer Now Available Right Here!</a>) and a time consuming viral website to keep us busy (<a href="http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/23/star-trek-viral-site-secrets-revealed/">Star Trek Viral Site &#8211; Secrets Revealed</a>).  I&#8217;m actually cool with that.  They don&#8217;t think the poster is good enough so they want to give us a new one.</p>
<p>This is the one we&#8217;ve been using:<br />
<center><img src="http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/star_trek_xi2.jpg" alt="Star Trek Teaser Poster 1" width="400" /></center>It&#8217;s not too bad.  I&#8217;ve gotten used to it.  I think it&#8217;s served pretty well as a teaser poster.  I mean, it&#8217;s obvious that it represents &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; so that makes it pretty successful.Now here is the new poster:<br />
<center><img src="http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/star-trek-11-poster-2.jpg" alt="Star Trek Teaser Poster 2" /></center>Notice anything?  Yeah, it&#8217;s pretty much the same poster only without all the neat colors.  Who thought this was better?  I don&#8217;t get it.  I mean, it matches the logo from the trailer and the viral site if that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re going for.  Other than that, I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s very successful.Any opinions?<br />
<!--bloggingzoom--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/25/new-star-trek-poster-released/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek Viral Site &#8211; Secrets Revealed</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/23/star-trek-viral-site-secrets-revealed</link>
		<comments>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/23/star-trek-viral-site-secrets-revealed#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.J. Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek XI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/star-trek-viral-site-secrets-revealed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to view the HD version of the &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; trailer that was attached to &#8220;Cloverfield&#8221; this weekend you simply need to visit the Star Trek Teaser Trailer Now Available Right Here!page here at Inner88. If you&#8217;re looking to get a little more involved in the whole Star Trek universe, however, you might [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to view the HD version of the &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; trailer that was attached to &#8220;Cloverfield&#8221; this weekend you simply need to visit the <strong><a href="http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/22/star-trek-teaser-trailer-now-available-right-here/">Star Trek Teaser Trailer Now Available Right Here!</a>page here at Inner88</strong>.  If you&#8217;re looking to get a little more involved in the whole Star Trek universe, however, you might want to check out the new viral site that went public yesterday.</p>
<p>If you visit the <strong><a href="http://www.paramount.com/startrek/">Official &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; Movie Site</a></strong> you will see the words &#8220;UNDER CONSTRUCTION&#8221; under the video.  Next to the words you&#8217;ll notice a small red dot.  Clicking that dot will take you to the viral site at <strong><a href="http://www.ncc-1701.com/">NCC-1701</a></strong>.<br />
<center><a href='http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/ncc1701_viralcap.jpg' title='Screen Capture from NCC-1701.com'><img width="490" src='http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/ncc1701_viralcap.jpg' alt='Screen Capture from NCC-1701.com' /></a></center>When you open the site you&#8217;ll see something similar to the above screen capture.  What you see may differ because the videos alternate with three being active and one being offline at any given time.  Reloading the page (sometimes more than once) will cause the offline camera to change.</p>
<p>The images on the cameras are distorted and out of focus.  On the lower right hand side of each video image, however, you&#8217;ll notice arrows and three numbers.  Clicking on the arrows or the numbers themselves changes the numbers which change the focus of the camera (you can also use the slider under the video).  Play around with it all you like until you get a clear image.</p>
<p>Alternately you can use the following numbers to view the clear videos:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Camera 01</strong> &#8211; 5 8 7</li>
<li><strong>Camera 02</strong> &#8211; 1 2 3</li>
<li><strong>Camera 03</strong> &#8211; 9 6 3</li>
<li><strong>Camera 04</strong> &#8211; 2 8 9</li>
</ul>
<p>After adjusting all of the cameras you will see the following images:<br />
<center><a href='http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/1701shipyard.jpg' title='Clear Image of Screen Capture from NCC-1701.com'><img width="490" src='http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/1701shipyard.jpg' alt='Clear Image of Screen Capture from NCC-1701.com' /></a></center></p>
<p>The videos are obviously security camera footage from the shipyard that is building the Enterprise NCC-1701, which is what we saw in the teaser trailer.  The significance of what we are seeing is still unknown&#8230;hence the viral nature of the page.  We&#8217;re supposed to study it and talk about it and wait for more clues.</p>
<p>If you wait long enough with the NCC-1701 page open (and it&#8217;s a pretty long wait although I&#8217;m not sure exactly how long) you&#8217;ll be rewarded.  The offline camera will activate and change to a view of a corridor.<br />
<center><a href='http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/sthallway.jpg' title='NCC-1701 Corridor Image'><img src='http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/sthallway.jpg' alt='NCC-1701 Corridor Image' /></a></center>Again, the significance of the corridor is not known at this time.  If you figure something out, please, let me know.  For now, that&#8217;s pretty much all I&#8217;ve got.  I&#8217;ll keep you updated if I find out anything more.<br />
<!--bloggingzoom--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/23/star-trek-viral-site-secrets-revealed/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek XI high-definition teaser and viral website</title>
		<link>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/22/star-trek-xi-high-definition-teaser-and-viral-website</link>
		<comments>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/22/star-trek-xi-high-definition-teaser-and-viral-website#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek XI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teasers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcritics.com/2008/01/star-trek-xi-high-definition-teaser-and-viral-website/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only took a few days for the first teaser of the new Star Trek movie to appear on Paramount.com. You have two choices below: Flash Player Teaser HD Trailer in Quicktime You can also just watch it below, thanks to Jason Clark, I have the code to embed the thing right here. Not only that, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only took a few days for the first teaser of the new <a href="http://www.paramount.com/startrek/"><em>Star Trek</em></a> movie to appear on <a href="http://www.paramount.com/">Paramount.com</a>. You have two choices below:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.paramount.com/startrek/">Flash Player Teaser</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.paramount.com/startrek/hd/index.html">HD Trailer in Quicktime</a></li>
</ul>
<p>You can also just watch it below, thanks to<a href="http://www.jasonaclark.com"> Jason Clark</a>, I have the code to embed the thing right here.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000"  codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0" id="gtembed" width="480" height="392"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?umid=164013"/><param name="quality" value="high" /><embed src="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?umid=164013" swLiveConnect="true" name="gtembed" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" allowFullScreen="true" quality="high" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="392"></embed></object></p>
<p>Not only that, but we have another viral website to go along with it!</p>
<p>If you visit the Flash Player site above, there is an &#8220;Under Construction&#8221; area at the bottom and a blinking red light to the right of it. Clicking on that <a href="http://www.ncc-1701.com/">takes you to a site</a> with four cameras overlooking the construction of the <em>USS Enterprise</em> at the shipyards.</p>
<p>The website is called <a href="http://www.ncc-1701.com/">NCC-1701.com</a>. Nice.</p>
<p>Below is a screenshot I grabbed from the teaser of the rear of the ship likely standing from the neck portion that connects to the saucer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/ussenterprise.jpg" title="USS Enterprise under construction"><img src="http://www.popcritics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/ussenterprise.jpg" alt="USS Enterprise under construction" height="294" width="469" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://popcritics.com/2008/01/22/star-trek-xi-high-definition-teaser-and-viral-website/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

